Thursday, 4 December 2014

5. SOCRATIVE


A Classroom Response System That Works Via Your Smartphone.

This is a tool that we tried in class. I think it's a fantastic way of engaging students who are obsessed with playing with their phones during lessons. Instead of being on Twitter or Facebook, they can instead be engaged in the class - via Socrative, which can be downloaded as a mobile app. 

This is a way of implementing the classroom response system without 'clickers'. Of course it does heavily depend on all students having access to their own mobile device, which my class do. However, the same rules apply; the success of using this tool depends wholly on the teacher creating effective questions that will test and engage the students, and support the learning objectives.

Here's how it works:




It's super simple to use and only takes seconds to login. It runs on tablets, smartphones, and laptops.






The students simply go to www.socrative.com and type in the room number to enter the room. 



WHAT A GREAT LITTLE TOOL THIS IS!



SOURCE:
http://www.socrative.com/
https://www.youtube.com/


Monday, 1 December 2014

4. CLASSROOM RESPONSE SYSTEMS

Do They Aid Learning?




Classroom response systems, also know as 'clickers', are a set of hardware and software that facilitate teaching and learning.

Activities include:

Posing a multiple choice question to the students via an overhead or computer projector.

Each student then answers using a hand held transmitter (a 'clicker') that relays a signal attached to the teacher's computer.

Software on the teacher's computer collects the student's answers and produces a bar chart showing how many students chose each of the answer choices. This can be kept private to the teacher or it can be shared to the class.

The teacher can then make 'on the fly' instructional choices in response to the bar chart of student answers by, for example, leading a collaborative discussion about the merits of the students' answer choices, and by discussing the answer in small groups.

Some might say that multiple-choice questions can be rather limiting in testing knowledge, so the oweness is fixed very firmly with the teacher in choosing the right questions. This is of paramount importance in determining positive outcomes. This device will only work well if the teacher chooses the right questions. Specific, targeted questions can serve many purposes in class, including assessing students' higher order thinking skills. Questions can not only be used to assess students, but also to engage them, since effective questions are different to the multiple-choice type questions that typically appear on an exam paper.

Here are a few types of effective clicker questions:

Recall Questions: These ask students to recall facts, concepts, or techniques relevant to class. They can be used to check whether students have done the reading, remembered important points from prior classes, or have memorised key facts. These don't generally generate discussion and don't require high order( on Bloom's taxonomy) thinking skills.

Conceptual Understanding Questions: These questions go beyond recall and assess students' understanding of important concepts. Answer choices can be based on students' misconceptions , so these questions work well to identify and address those misconceptions. Asking students to classify, match characteristics with concepts, select the best explanation for a concept, or translate different ways of looking at an idea are examples of conceptual understanding questions.

Application Questions: These require students to apply their knowledge and understanding to particular situations and contexts. Application questions often ask students to make a decision; connect course content to 'real life' situations in a given scenario, implement procedures, predict outcomes, or even predict their peers' responses to specific questions.

Critical Thinking Questions: These questions operate at the higher level of Bloom's taxonomy, on the 'deep' learning level. They require students to analyse and synthesise relationships among multiple, and often abstract concepts, and make evaluations based on specific criteria.

Student Perspective Questions: These ask students to share their opinions, experiences, ideals and values, or demographic information. They don't have correct answers, but by surfacing various perspectives, they can help both student and teacher better understand those perspectives, which can generate rich discussion; particularly those questions that deal with ethical,legal, moral or religious issues. They can also help students connect their personal experiences to more abstract course content. The anonymity that clickers provide can be an essential ingredient in being able to ask certain questions.

Confidence Level Questions: Prompting students to assess and monitor their confidence levels in their ability to problem solve, can aid in their own metacognition.

Monitoring Questions: These types of questions provide the teacher with information about how each student is approaching their learning and their course. 

    I think these are great, and I can't wait       to implement them into my lessons.             The problem is that our college doesn't         have any of these devices. However,           smartphones can be used with                     applications like Socrative. I will look at       Socrative in my next blog. 

Teaching with these classroom response systems can  take a number of directions. Teachers must though, match the activities to the relevance of the course material, time constraints,learning objectives, and their own teaching styles.

Here are some other possible Clicker activities:

Attendance: Clickers can be used (especially for a big class) to take attendance directly, by simply asking students,"are you here today?"

Summative Assessment: They can be used for graded activities, such as multiple-choice qizzes or tests throughout the different stages of the course.

Formative Assessment: Clickers can be used to pose questions to students for the purpose of collecting 'real time' information about their learning. Students can then use the feedback to monitor their own learning, and teachers can use it to change how they manage their class in response to students' needs.


  




REFERENCE:

Younie,S and Leask,M. Teaching with Technologies (2013) Oxford University Press

http://www.brown.edu/about/administration/sheridan-center/teaching-learning/course-design/learning-technologyhttp:

//www.microsoft.com/en-us/education/educators/higher-education-resources/default.aspx#fbid=syPC2RYijyl

http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/clickers/





Wednesday, 12 November 2014

3. TED TALKS: TACKLING TECHNOLOGY

My journey into the technological realm of teaching and learning has proved (so far) to be exceedingly frustrating. I have spent hours simply trying to work out how to get this blog to look the way I want it to... to no avail. It seems I'm stuck with this layout. I dare not try and change it in case I mess it up entirely. For me, this process is one of trial and error, of just pressing buttons and 'having a go', and it is clear that I have a long way to go.

I am learning though. I was delighted with myself when I managed to upload an image for the first time..one small step! I then managed(in my last blog) to do an online Mind Map, scan my own hand drawn bubble map and upload it, and I also managed to work out how to do a hyperlink. The problem is that it takes hours and hours just to do the simplest thing, and I'm not entirely certain that the links will even work. I have been reading all the necessary books, and trawling through educational websites to try and discover which ICT tools are available to use in the classroom, and how and when they can be implemented to the greatest effect.

Carnegie Mellon University Professor Herbert A. Simon, winner of the 1978 Nobel Prize in Economics, the A.M. Turing Award and the National Medal of Science and many other awards for his work in cognitive psychology and computer science, states," We must not use technology just because it's available. We must use it when, and only when, we can see how it will enable us to do the education job better." 

These are a couple of Ted Talks that I found interesting...now I just have to 'embed' them (another term I now understand), as opposed to just creating a link, which is not as reliable because it is not saved on the hard drive. This means that if I ever wanted to show this talk on a PowerPoint in class, because the college computers run off one server, embedding means that it will be there when I go and look for it. We discovered this in class yesterday when we gave a presentation on Cognitive Theorists to the rest of the group.

Carol Dweck researches "growth mindset"- the idea that we can grow our brain's capacity to learn and solve problems. I'm a believer! I hope it doesn't take too long though - I need to get techi if I want to engage my students, but more importantly, I need to nail this blog by 22nd January, and I still don't know what 'labels' are for, how to change the headings, or how to get each post to follow on from the next, or how to display my profile or blog archive...? gulp!
   




This is taking forever to upload!

I have just been informed that the upload speed in our area is worse than shockingly slow, it's diabolical -  which is why I have been sitting here for 20 minutes,and still nothing's happened. Can't wait to get 'optical fibre connection'!! (whatever that is..?)

Half an hour later...still nothing!? (Plan B) I'll try and embed it directly from YouTube (share button)and see what happens..?

Whoops, I've just sent it to a separate blog post...Mmmmm??? That's because it wouldn't let me save it to draft, so I pressed publish. Try again... this time I'll just type in the url and do it via Blogger (add a video from YouTube)


 RESULT!!!



Here's another.. David Pogue's Top Ten Tips for dummies (that's me) - Technology Made Easier. 




This experiential method of learning is a painful and time consuming process, but I think (Ihope) that I have just taught myself to embed a video.. now I'll have to publish it to see..fingers crossed!



IT WORKED!

Carol Dweck may be on to something!


SOURCE:
https://www.youtube.com/












Friday, 31 October 2014

2. ALL MAPPED OUT

 I love mind maps. I use them all the time, and have done since I was a child. Creating a visual representation of a concept or theme is a quick and easy way of organising and connecting thoughts or problems. A visual map allows for a 'whole brain' thinking process: starting with the basic germ of an idea, concept or theme, leading to the synthesis of an abstract idea made manifest.Mind maps are great for problem solving, evaluating and recapping. A mind map can take you on a journey of discovery, putting things in context, and  allowing you to see the 'big picture' and the end result more clearly.

Of course, because of my incompetence with computers, I have never tried to use any of the on line digital versions of mind mapping tools, so I was interested to see how they would compare to my long and trusted (possibly primitive?) method of doing it by hand. The beauty of doing by hand is that it is instant and thoughts and ideas are spontaneous - thus allowing for maximum creative responses. Also, just the very nature of 'doing it yourself'; the actual physical process of drawing your own conclusions and ideas in your own way; in patterns of your own creation, allows for ideas and questions to flow naturally and intuitively on the page. This ,arguably, gives a more personal connection to the topic, which aids memory and enables deeper learning.

Hand drawn mind maps can range from quick scribbles that you do in two minutes, like these I did just to try and get my mind in order before starting to write this blog....(although all it did was confirm my confusion).





... to more creative maps, like this:




Tony Buzan has been credited for 'inventing' the mind map - he didn't, mind mapping or visual organising has been around for centuries.What he did was to take a well known technique and 'invent' a name for it, which he then trademarked and marketed very successfully through BBC programmes,books and lecture tours. The fact that you don't hear the term 'idea sunbursting', or 'bubble thinking' much anymore, but do hear of Mind Mapping all the time, is a tribute to his marketing skill and proselytising. 

On line Mind Mapping applications are big business! There are literally hundreds of different mind mapping applications available on the Internet. Some are free, but most are not. The market is flooded with them. When I tried wading through the Mind Mapping mindfield to try and discern which were worth having a go with, I quickly discovered, having researched which were regarded as the best via http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/best-mind-mapping-tools/  and other numerous websites, that the best ones were not free and not cheap either. 

Amongst these were:

Inspiration 9 http://www.inspiration.com/


News



Mindmeister http://www.mindmeister.com/education

This is a sophisticated app endorsed by Stanford University, John Hopkins, U.C.C and Columbia Law School, which allows simultaneous collaboration from unlimited users across the globe.It allows you to embed videos and share them. EXPENSIVE!

bubbl.us https://bubbl.us/mindmap is free.. but you can see what I thought of it...




Follow this link to view properly



..not much! It's very dull! It's impossible to be free flowing. It's too static and clinical, and it doesn't allow for collaboration. 

Here's a better one:

Realtime Boardhttps://realtimeboard.com/
Good for on line collaborative brainstorming sessions. You can draw,work with images,post videos, write notes and comment on materials through the use of colourful post it stickers. It's not free, but there's a free education version..however that isn't quite as exciting.

Stormboard https://www.stormboard.com/
This is slick - collaborative on line brainstorming activities. An unlimited amount of 'idea boards' for up to five people. On each of your stormboards you can include sticky notes, images, videos, drawings and word documents. It's simple to use, you just drag and drop - similar to Padlet http://padlet.com/. Each item you add to your board includes a commenting option that allows fellow collaborators  (or class) to use for feedback on ideas. Great! - but not free.

ExamTimehttps://www.examtime.com/p/1319-How-to-Create-A-Mindmap-mind_maps?frame=true
This looks good - it has flashcards,quizzes, notes,a study planner, mind maps, PowerPoint and notes that will spring to life and play right before your eyes. I am definitely going to investigate this further for use in my pre GCSE English class. It looks great!

According to Petty (Teaching Today. A practical guide.4th ed.p.348) visual representations, like mind maps are " most powerful when made by the learner; quite powerful when carefully scrutinised by the learner with questions in mind; and only moderately useful when experienced passively. Ideally, there is an audience for what the learner produces." In other words, collaboration is required to get the best out of Mind Maps. 

If you can find the right on line digital collaborative tool that works for your class, then great ... but if you can't, you won't go far wrong with a roll of lining paper and a set of colourful pens to get the whole class involved in a creative, spontaneous and fun way to explore a concept or recap on a topic. Mind Maps have been around longer than computers, and although there are some great applications on line, the old fashioned way of just 'doing it' with pen and paper, or whiteboard and marker, will always suffice if you don't have enough money in the coffer or enough computers for collaboration in the classroom. 



References  

Beatty et al (2006)

Petty,G.Teaching Today.A practical guide.4th ed.(2009)
www.theguardian.comhttp:
jamesgulliverhancock.com/projects/artists-writers-thinkers-dreamers/






Sunday, 26 October 2014

1. ANDIE BLOGS OFF!

INTO CYBERSPACE


                                       3  2  1  .......





I did it! I'm out there! I'm on air!

This is my very first blog (and my greatest technological achievement!) It is also the first of a sequence of blogs that will attempt to record my experiences and thoughts (good, bad and ugly) about the various uses of information technology that are available to be implemented in the classroom. I am about to embark on a technological voyage of discovery, but I am travelling into an unknown realm of which I have no confidence and zero understanding. I hope it will become easier as I learn to press the right buttons and navigate my way around this dreaded 'machine': easier too, I hope, than the journey I took to get here and write this....
( Bad and Ugly!)


                        Technology isn't hard - Change is hard.

                                                               
I don't like being called a dinosaur or a technophobe..the truth is I just never learnt; I never needed to, until now. In the late 1970's, when I was in the sixth form, computer science was a brand new subject that didn't have any credence as a 'real' subject..it wasn't considered an academic choice like History or English or Chemistry. It was taken alongside subjects like Secretarial Skills and Horticulture..if only we'd known! I remember when 'The Computer' first arrived at our school. Everyone piled in to the new 'Computer Room' to have a look at this strange new beast. It was colossal! It looked like it belonged in Dr Who's Tardis. It took up the entire room; you had to walk around it. It had lots of flashing lights and bright buttons and it made very loud, unsettling noises when it was switched on...but, that was then, and this is now. The classroom has changed beyond recognition since I was taught from the blackboard and chalk, and "have you remembered yer text books?" approach. This is not an excuse as to why I am so technologically inept,this is just background: I need to catch up and switch on!

....but where do I want this journey to take me?



  


I'd like to think that these blogs are going to take me on a voyage of discovery to technical enlightenment. I'd like to be able to say at the end, that it has been an invaluable learning process. One that unveils; layer upon layer of truths (and non truths) about myself as a learner, as a teacher, and of 21st century teaching practises in general. I'd like to think that by the end of this journey, I won't be scared of technology; that I'll have the skills and the 'know how' to be able to create amazing, inspiring things with this 'machine' that, presently, hates me as much as I hate it. I'd like to be able to say," I'm a computer wizard!" or, "I can do it, I'll show you how."

This is just the beginning though, and for now.. this is me.





    ....but WATCH THIS SPACE!